<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Medical Justice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.medicaljustice.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.medicaljustice.com</link>
	<description>Relentlessly protecting physicians from frivolous lawsuits.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 01:32:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When Experts Opine Outside Their Core Competence. The Lockerbie Bomber by Ziga Tretjak, MD</title>
		<link>http://blog.medicaljustice.com/?p=1392&#038;cpage=1#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>Ziga Tretjak, MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 01:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.medicaljustice.com/?p=1392#comment-367</guid>
		<description>I agree with comments of Dr. Prasad but in addition believe that not only was there pressure and twisting from BP on the government, the BP likely presented the relevant docs an &quot;offer they could not refuse&quot; to either spin or abstain the assessment. Why else such silence?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with comments of Dr. Prasad but in addition believe that not only was there pressure and twisting from BP on the government, the BP likely presented the relevant docs an &#8220;offer they could not refuse&#8221; to either spin or abstain the assessment. Why else such silence?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When Experts Opine Outside Their Core Competence. The Lockerbie Bomber by Sudha Prasad, MD</title>
		<link>http://blog.medicaljustice.com/?p=1392&#038;cpage=1#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>Sudha Prasad, MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 02:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.medicaljustice.com/?p=1392#comment-364</guid>
		<description>what about the ties to BP and how this decision was very helpful to them? And the fact that they allegedly placed pressure on the British government to release Mr. Megrahi because it would provide a more favorable drilling environment? Perhaps the &quot;opining of non experts&quot; is less relevant than the power of large corporations over the British government. It may be that the opinions of the experts were well known but deliberately left from the report because they did not coincide with a larger goal for the interests involved. So, like all scientific reports, the facts can always be manipulated to suite the needs of the people in power. I think that is a lot more sinister than a non expert sincerely offering an opinion if that is indeed what he did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about the ties to BP and how this decision was very helpful to them? And the fact that they allegedly placed pressure on the British government to release Mr. Megrahi because it would provide a more favorable drilling environment? Perhaps the &#8220;opining of non experts&#8221; is less relevant than the power of large corporations over the British government. It may be that the opinions of the experts were well known but deliberately left from the report because they did not coincide with a larger goal for the interests involved. So, like all scientific reports, the facts can always be manipulated to suite the needs of the people in power. I think that is a lot more sinister than a non expert sincerely offering an opinion if that is indeed what he did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When Experts Opine Outside Their Core Competence. The Lockerbie Bomber by Dan Lorieo, MD</title>
		<link>http://blog.medicaljustice.com/?p=1392&#038;cpage=1#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Lorieo, MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 04:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.medicaljustice.com/?p=1392#comment-363</guid>
		<description>As a surgeon it often irks me when a patient with a surgical problem tells me that his internist told him not to &quot;worry about it until it bothers you&quot;.  When that time comes late on a Saturday night, where is the internist?  Comfortably at home!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a surgeon it often irks me when a patient with a surgical problem tells me that his internist told him not to &#8220;worry about it until it bothers you&#8221;.  When that time comes late on a Saturday night, where is the internist?  Comfortably at home!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AMA Report: Lawsuits Are Frequent; Really Frequent by j. crowder</title>
		<link>http://blog.medicaljustice.com/?p=1343&#038;cpage=1#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator>j. crowder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 16:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.medicaljustice.com/?p=1343#comment-361</guid>
		<description>All by themselves?  The lawsuit industry doesn&#039;t just prey on physicians but on anyone with a pocket, and not just  a deep one.   Personal injury lawyers will accept cases that they think they can win.  Period.  Slip and fall injuries, plane manufacturers sued after the pilot ran out of gas and crashed,   bizarre drug reactions, hurt feelings, you name it.  There is no end to the laundry list of potential complaints which feed the industry.   American medical practitioners certainly didn&#039;t create all of that.  Sure, the health care professions comprise a cross-section of society and there will inevitably be bad apples but the vast majority are highly qualified and ethical, and I don&#039;t know of another field which is more intensely-regulated than health care.  To paint the entire field with your broad brush of incompetence is more suspect than the data.  You didn&#039;t mention whether the 500 daily deaths in the US include patients who were receiving emergency care or who were undergoing treatment for already-life-threatening conditions or whether they are directly attributable to malpractice.   And yes, I agree that our society is over-medicated.  However, just as health care providers are taking steps along with law enforcement to reduce such abuses as doctor-shopping they are now being told that a new darling of the trial bar is litigation for UNDER-MEDICATING  patients who claim that their pain has not been sufficiently relieved.   The perfect complaint--one that is almost totally subjective.  And last, you seem to believe that a victory for the defense in a malpractice case means that the provider is unscathed.  Whether or not the jury awards money to the plaintiff, malpractice complaints are incredibly stressful to the provider and have a pronounced effect on his/her attitude toward patients.  Defensive practice is real and does contribute to health care costs, no matter what the American Bar Association claims.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All by themselves?  The lawsuit industry doesn&#8217;t just prey on physicians but on anyone with a pocket, and not just  a deep one.   Personal injury lawyers will accept cases that they think they can win.  Period.  Slip and fall injuries, plane manufacturers sued after the pilot ran out of gas and crashed,   bizarre drug reactions, hurt feelings, you name it.  There is no end to the laundry list of potential complaints which feed the industry.   American medical practitioners certainly didn&#8217;t create all of that.  Sure, the health care professions comprise a cross-section of society and there will inevitably be bad apples but the vast majority are highly qualified and ethical, and I don&#8217;t know of another field which is more intensely-regulated than health care.  To paint the entire field with your broad brush of incompetence is more suspect than the data.  You didn&#8217;t mention whether the 500 daily deaths in the US include patients who were receiving emergency care or who were undergoing treatment for already-life-threatening conditions or whether they are directly attributable to malpractice.   And yes, I agree that our society is over-medicated.  However, just as health care providers are taking steps along with law enforcement to reduce such abuses as doctor-shopping they are now being told that a new darling of the trial bar is litigation for UNDER-MEDICATING  patients who claim that their pain has not been sufficiently relieved.   The perfect complaint&#8211;one that is almost totally subjective.  And last, you seem to believe that a victory for the defense in a malpractice case means that the provider is unscathed.  Whether or not the jury awards money to the plaintiff, malpractice complaints are incredibly stressful to the provider and have a pronounced effect on his/her attitude toward patients.  Defensive practice is real and does contribute to health care costs, no matter what the American Bar Association claims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When Experts Opine Outside Their Core Competence. The Lockerbie Bomber by J Hoye</title>
		<link>http://blog.medicaljustice.com/?p=1392&#038;cpage=1#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>J Hoye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 12:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.medicaljustice.com/?p=1392#comment-359</guid>
		<description>Even here -- primary care bashing.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even here &#8212; primary care bashing&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AMA Report: Lawsuits Are Frequent; Really Frequent by K Patrick McDonald</title>
		<link>http://blog.medicaljustice.com/?p=1343&#038;cpage=1#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>K Patrick McDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 01:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.medicaljustice.com/?p=1343#comment-351</guid>
		<description>In the first place, these numbers are seriously suspect, coming as they do from a key player in the business of medicine, with a major stake in the volume they purport to be true.

In the second place, the mitigating circumstances are statisically off the chart, and profoundly important to the wellbeing of society as a whole. And a few of those factors are these:

1. 500 citizens die while being medically treated, every day of the year. You didn&#039;t hear THAT during the 2-year Health Care Reform chatter, did you?

2. The Nat&#039;l Practitioner Data Bank holds files on 237,000 physicians, considered &quot;Dangerous&quot; or &quot;Questionable.&quot; From murder to child molestation, from rape to drug running to insurance theft, almost exactly 50 doctors are found guilty of agregious misbehavior each week. 

3. It is doctors - and no one else in society - who gleefully overprescribe the mind-numbing volume of drugs to the masses, at an ever-increasing rate (Does it concern anyone at all that fully 30% of all Girl Scouts at summer camp are on prescription drugs? Is there any doubt it will rise to 50% at some point in the future?)

4. The watchdog group Public Citizen reports that &#039;Med Mal&#039; lawsuits are, in fact, few &amp; far between. Fewer than 10% of all patients harmed by medical treatment ever bring suit at all. In those cases that are brought to trial, far more than half are won by the physician. Contrary to popular belief, juries tend to side with the medical care provider, unless the injury is practically undisputed. And anyone who thinks it&#039;s a piece of cake to convince an attorney to take on a Med Mal case, well, they just aren&#039;t paying attention.

5. Because of the &#039;monster&#039; million-dollar suits that DO make the headlines, Americans typically suppose these victims are raking in tons of money on zillions of kooky cases. But factually, very, very few patient victories result in much at all.

I am by no means proud of the fact that I live in a country considered &quot;lawsuit crazy&quot; by the rest of the world. But I can say with some confidence that American medical practitioners have brought this plague on themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the first place, these numbers are seriously suspect, coming as they do from a key player in the business of medicine, with a major stake in the volume they purport to be true.</p>
<p>In the second place, the mitigating circumstances are statisically off the chart, and profoundly important to the wellbeing of society as a whole. And a few of those factors are these:</p>
<p>1. 500 citizens die while being medically treated, every day of the year. You didn&#8217;t hear THAT during the 2-year Health Care Reform chatter, did you?</p>
<p>2. The Nat&#8217;l Practitioner Data Bank holds files on 237,000 physicians, considered &#8220;Dangerous&#8221; or &#8220;Questionable.&#8221; From murder to child molestation, from rape to drug running to insurance theft, almost exactly 50 doctors are found guilty of agregious misbehavior each week. </p>
<p>3. It is doctors &#8211; and no one else in society &#8211; who gleefully overprescribe the mind-numbing volume of drugs to the masses, at an ever-increasing rate (Does it concern anyone at all that fully 30% of all Girl Scouts at summer camp are on prescription drugs? Is there any doubt it will rise to 50% at some point in the future?)</p>
<p>4. The watchdog group Public Citizen reports that &#8216;Med Mal&#8217; lawsuits are, in fact, few &amp; far between. Fewer than 10% of all patients harmed by medical treatment ever bring suit at all. In those cases that are brought to trial, far more than half are won by the physician. Contrary to popular belief, juries tend to side with the medical care provider, unless the injury is practically undisputed. And anyone who thinks it&#8217;s a piece of cake to convince an attorney to take on a Med Mal case, well, they just aren&#8217;t paying attention.</p>
<p>5. Because of the &#8216;monster&#8217; million-dollar suits that DO make the headlines, Americans typically suppose these victims are raking in tons of money on zillions of kooky cases. But factually, very, very few patient victories result in much at all.</p>
<p>I am by no means proud of the fact that I live in a country considered &#8220;lawsuit crazy&#8221; by the rest of the world. But I can say with some confidence that American medical practitioners have brought this plague on themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on John Stossel, Tort Lawyers and Defensive Medicine by Miguel Pappolla, MD. PhD</title>
		<link>http://blog.medicaljustice.com/?p=1261&#038;cpage=1#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>Miguel Pappolla, MD. PhD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 17:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.medicaljustice.com/?p=1261#comment-317</guid>
		<description>We must keep on fighting not only to protect ourselves, but also to introduce unequivocal legislation to criminally punish the pervassive acts of corruption plaguing the practice of law in this country. I am currently doing that to fight the extreme abuse in family law. It is unbelievable and unfathomable the severity of damage that these predators cause to our society. And they are &#039;legal&#039;, for now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We must keep on fighting not only to protect ourselves, but also to introduce unequivocal legislation to criminally punish the pervassive acts of corruption plaguing the practice of law in this country. I am currently doing that to fight the extreme abuse in family law. It is unbelievable and unfathomable the severity of damage that these predators cause to our society. And they are &#8216;legal&#8217;, for now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on John Stossel, Tort Lawyers and Defensive Medicine by Steve</title>
		<link>http://blog.medicaljustice.com/?p=1261&#038;cpage=1#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 16:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.medicaljustice.com/?p=1261#comment-316</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s call it what it is....the tort system is nothing more than a system of legalized extortion.  The tort lawyers don&#039;t care one iota about their clients.  It is all about the money.  I have had PI lawyer friends tell me that &quot;the truth doesn&#039;t matter, it is all a game..&quot;  Until a large percentage of the public figure this out and demand change this mass crime on society will continue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s call it what it is&#8230;.the tort system is nothing more than a system of legalized extortion.  The tort lawyers don&#8217;t care one iota about their clients.  It is all about the money.  I have had PI lawyer friends tell me that &#8220;the truth doesn&#8217;t matter, it is all a game..&#8221;  Until a large percentage of the public figure this out and demand change this mass crime on society will continue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on John Stossel, Tort Lawyers and Defensive Medicine by Sanjose Mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.medicaljustice.com/?p=1261&#038;cpage=1#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanjose Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.medicaljustice.com/?p=1261#comment-314</guid>
		<description>Mr. Kane (above) suggests that tort liability is a method of “balancing the system.”  The issue of course is that the entire system is “owned” by the legal profession.  Because lawyers are intimately involved with every aspect of the law and society, they are the ones’ that set up the system, operate it, over-see it and control it. This extends from the legislature to the judiciary (of course) and the executive branches. 

The only aspect not completely owned by lawyers is the press, but even there, lawyers exert nearly absolute control over what can be printed. So, in terms of balancing, Mr. Kane is correct, in that the any balancing that occurs is in favor of lawyers and their fees. Should any “balancing” occur to or for any other venue, it is entirely accidental and aberrant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Kane (above) suggests that tort liability is a method of “balancing the system.”  The issue of course is that the entire system is “owned” by the legal profession.  Because lawyers are intimately involved with every aspect of the law and society, they are the ones’ that set up the system, operate it, over-see it and control it. This extends from the legislature to the judiciary (of course) and the executive branches. </p>
<p>The only aspect not completely owned by lawyers is the press, but even there, lawyers exert nearly absolute control over what can be printed. So, in terms of balancing, Mr. Kane is correct, in that the any balancing that occurs is in favor of lawyers and their fees. Should any “balancing” occur to or for any other venue, it is entirely accidental and aberrant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on John Stossel, Tort Lawyers and Defensive Medicine by mark trop</title>
		<link>http://blog.medicaljustice.com/?p=1261&#038;cpage=1#comment-313</link>
		<dc:creator>mark trop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.medicaljustice.com/?p=1261#comment-313</guid>
		<description>sooner or later the pulse will break the other way.  In the not so distant past, tort lawyers were the ones who found it hopeless to get relief in situations which, under the strict reality of tort law (even as confining as it was in the social systems that existed in the 18 - 1900s), where relief was deserved.

The tort lawyers enjoyed a kind of blossoming of opportunity, starting in the mid to late 1900s (lets say)  and now its gotten to the point where they are marauding predators;  who will make something out of nothing; and putting every one in a state of panic and anxiety.   Eventually this excess will swing back the other way.  But ofcourse only after a long war.  

The idea that tort law was available to create an adequate response to sad flawed human reality I don&#039;t think existed;   when our nation became luxuriant enough to fuel the system;   same way cars kept getting bigger even though fuel was an obvious problem;   tort law grew to the point where;    yes;  those lawyers who were really good at it..  yes;  they found a way to make a good living.   No one except them would say the system makes any sense.

What then to do about it?    Keep on fighting the war.  Which will last for our lifetime, I&#039;d suppose for sure.  (what am I?   Surgeon&#039;s spouse;   defense attorney because of that that I described above a little)   What we are looking for is a statement which describes what Justice would be, for this circumstance.   When the war ends;  that is when it felt right to me over my 54 years.  When vietnam ended.  For the time being;  we must keep on truckin.. we just must keep on truckin.   Requiring that our consent to what we are subjected to, is also heard at least as much as those who claim justice requires recompense when things go sour.  

If we were judges; and legislators  (and gods)  what would we do, to set it all right?

What solutions are there?    When will we sleep, like we did before the first lawsuit arrived?  Sooner or later the tide will go out.   Until so,  we need to keep constructing our dyke.  The temptation to drop a few bombs remains hard to resist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sooner or later the pulse will break the other way.  In the not so distant past, tort lawyers were the ones who found it hopeless to get relief in situations which, under the strict reality of tort law (even as confining as it was in the social systems that existed in the 18 &#8211; 1900s), where relief was deserved.</p>
<p>The tort lawyers enjoyed a kind of blossoming of opportunity, starting in the mid to late 1900s (lets say)  and now its gotten to the point where they are marauding predators;  who will make something out of nothing; and putting every one in a state of panic and anxiety.   Eventually this excess will swing back the other way.  But ofcourse only after a long war.  </p>
<p>The idea that tort law was available to create an adequate response to sad flawed human reality I don&#8217;t think existed;   when our nation became luxuriant enough to fuel the system;   same way cars kept getting bigger even though fuel was an obvious problem;   tort law grew to the point where;    yes;  those lawyers who were really good at it..  yes;  they found a way to make a good living.   No one except them would say the system makes any sense.</p>
<p>What then to do about it?    Keep on fighting the war.  Which will last for our lifetime, I&#8217;d suppose for sure.  (what am I?   Surgeon&#8217;s spouse;   defense attorney because of that that I described above a little)   What we are looking for is a statement which describes what Justice would be, for this circumstance.   When the war ends;  that is when it felt right to me over my 54 years.  When vietnam ended.  For the time being;  we must keep on truckin.. we just must keep on truckin.   Requiring that our consent to what we are subjected to, is also heard at least as much as those who claim justice requires recompense when things go sour.  </p>
<p>If we were judges; and legislators  (and gods)  what would we do, to set it all right?</p>
<p>What solutions are there?    When will we sleep, like we did before the first lawsuit arrived?  Sooner or later the tide will go out.   Until so,  we need to keep constructing our dyke.  The temptation to drop a few bombs remains hard to resist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
